Comparison of seminal characteristics of Aberdeen Angus, Holstein and Nelore bulls before and after cryopreservation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i16.23382

Keywords:

Freezing; Bovine; Bos taurus; Bos indicus.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate parameters indicative of sperm quality of fresh and post-thawed semen of Aberdeen Angus, Holstein and Nelore bulls. Thirty-nine bulls were used: Aberdeen Angus (n=13), Holstein (n=13) and Nelore (n=13). The ejaculate collects were performed twice a week using artificial vagina, totaling 792 semen collections, 307 for Aberdeen Angus, 225 for Holstein and 260 for Nelore bulls. After collection, fresh semen was evaluated and semen freezing was performed. After freezing, the batches were thawed and progressive motility was determined. The analysis of fresh semen showed that there was no difference (P = 0.053) between the Aberdeen Angus and Nelore breeds, while ejaculates from Holstein bulls showed a statistical difference (P = 0.024). As well, a difference (P<0.001) was identified in the sperm concentration of the three breeds. In the samples evaluated after thawing, a statistical difference was observed between Holstein and Nelore breeds (P<0.001), while the values of the Angus breed were similar to the other two breeds. The difference in motility of fresh and post-thawing semen showed that Nelore and Angus bulls showed greater variation in values between the analyzes (26.0±8.9% and 25.3±8.4%, respectively) showing a significant difference (P<0.001) in relation to Holstein bulls (20.6±9.3%) that obtained the smallest difference. The analysis of fresh and post-thawing semen did not show any significant difference (P=0.13) between breeds. In conclusion, the semen cryopreservation process causes a decrease in the physical parameters of the semen and these quality losses suffer interference according to the breeds.

References

Abud, C. O. G., Abud, L. J., Neto, J. C. O., Dode, M. A. N., Sereno, J. R. B., & Martins, C. F. (2014). Comparação entre os sistemas automatizado e convencional de criopreservação de sêmen bovino. Ciencia Animal Brasileira, 15(1), 32–37. https://doi.org/10.5216/cab.v15i1.12233

ASBIA. (2020). Index ASBIA 3o trimestre/2020. Associação Brasileira de Inseminação Artificial.

Bergstein, T. G., Weiss, R. R., & Bicudo, S. D. (2014). Bergstein et al._1979.pdf. Revista Brasileira de Reprodução Animal, 38(4), 189–194.

Bloom, E. (1973). Ultrastructure of some characteristic sperm defects and a proposal for a new classificationof bull spermiogram. Nordisk Veterinaer Medicin, 25, 383–391.

Brito, L. F. C., Silva, A. E. D. F., Rodrigues, L. H., Vieira, F. V., Deragon, L. A. G., & Kastelic, J. P. (2002). Effects of environmental factors, age and genotype on sperm production and semen quality in Bos indicus and Bos taurus AI bulls in Brazil. Animal Reproduction Science, 70(3–4), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(02)00009-X

Celeghini, E. C. C., De Arruda, R. P., De Andrade, A. F. C., Nascimento, J., & Raphael, C. F. (2007). Practical techniques for bovine sperm simultaneous fluorimetric assessment of plasma, acrosomal and mitochondrial membranes. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 42(5), 479–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2006.00810.x

Chacur, M. G. M., Mizusaki, K. T., Santos, F. H., Cesare, A. G., Gabriel Filho, L. R. A., Oba, E., & Ramos, A. A. (2012). Influência da estação do ano nas características do sêmen e na concentração de hormônios em touros nelore e simental. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinaria e Zootecnia, 64(3), 540–546. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352012000300003

El-Harairy, M. A., Eid, L. N., Zeidan, A. E. B., El-Salaam, A. A., & El-Kishk, M. A. M. (2011). Quality and fertility of the frozen-thawed bull semen as affected by the different cryoprotectants and glutathione levels. J Am Sci, 7(5), 791–801.

Freitas, C. de P., Crespilho, A. M., Papa, F. O., & Dell’Aqua Júnior, J. A. (2009). Metodologia de avaliação laboratorial do sêmen congelado bovino. Revista Brasileira de Reprodução Animal, 33(4), 213–222.

García-Álvarez, O., Maroto-Morales, A., Ramón, M., Del Olmo, E., Jiménez-Rabadán, P., Fernández-Santos, M. R., Anel-López, L., Garde, J. J., & Soler, A. J. (2014). Dynamics of sperm subpopulations based on motility and plasma membrane status in thawed ram spermatozoa incubated under conditions that support in vitro capacitation and fertilisation. Reproduction, Fertility and Development, 26(5), 725–732. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD13034

Koivisto, M. B., Costa, M. T. A., Perri, S. H. V., & Vicente, W. R. R. (2009). The effect of season on semen characteristics and freezability in bos indicus and bos taurus bulls in the Southeastern Region of Brazil. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 44(4), 587–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01023.x

Layek, S. S., Mohanty, T. K., Kumaresan, A., & Parks, J. E. (2016). Cryopreservation of bull semen: Evolution from egg yolk based to soybean based extenders. Animal Reproduction Science, 172, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2016.04.013

Leite, P. A., Schreder, G. G., Almeida, C. L. R., Zúccari, C. E. S. N., & Costa e Silva, E. V. (2011). Criopreservação do sêmen Bovino. Científica. Ciências Biológicas e Da Saúde, 13(4), 279–286. http://revista.pgsskroton.com.br/index.php/JHealthSci/article/view/1147/1107

Li, Y., Kalo, D., Zeron, Y., & Roth, Z. (2016). Progressive motility-a potential predictive parameter for semen fertilization capacity in bovines. Zygote, 24(1), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0967199414000720

Morrell, J. M., Valeanu, A. S., Lundeheim, N., & Johannisson, A. (2018). Sperm quality in frozen beef and dairy bull semen. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 60(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-018-0396-2

Ntenka, A., Tsousis, G., Brozos, C., Kiossis, E., Boscos, C., & Tsakmakidis, I. . (2016). Breed differences of bull frozen- ­ thawed semen. July, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.12769

Queiroz, V. L. D., Filho, L. C. C. da C., Rosa, L. D. S., Zúccari, C. E. S. N., & Costa e Silva, E. V. da. (2015). Sazonalidade Na Congelabilidade De Sêmen Bovino. Arquivos de Ciências Veterinárias e Zoologia Da UNIPAR, 18(1), 39–47.

Ram, K. L., Tiwari, R. P., Mishra, G. K., Sahasrabudhe, S. A., & Nair, A. K. (2017). Effect of heat stress on seminal characteristics of murrah buffalo bull semen. Buffalo Bulletin, 36(2), 369–378.

Thomas, C. A., Garner, D. L., Dejarnette, J. M., & Marshall, C. E. (1997). Fluorometric Assessments of Acrosomal Integrity and Viability in Cryopreserved Bovine Spermatozoa. Biology of Reproduction, 56(4), 991–998.

Zhang, B. R., Larsson, B., Lundeheim, N., & Rodriguez-Martinez, H. (1998). Sperm characteristics and zona pellucida binding in relation to field fertility of frozen-thawed semen from dairy AI bulls. International Journal of Andrology, 21(4), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2605.1998.00114.x

Downloads

Published

15/12/2021

How to Cite

SARANHOLI, D. A. C.; PAULA, R. R. de .; PYTILAK, E. .; AFONSO, F.; CANELA, L. F.; ALMEIDA, A. B. M. de; HIDALGO, M. M. T.; MARTINS, M. I. M.; BLASCHI, W.; BARREIROS, T. R. R. . Comparison of seminal characteristics of Aberdeen Angus, Holstein and Nelore bulls before and after cryopreservation. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 16, p. e408101623382, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i16.23382. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/23382. Acesso em: 22 nov. 2024.

Issue

Section

Agrarian and Biological Sciences