Elements that integrate checklists for safe cardiac surgery
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i1.24795Keywords:
Checklist; Thoracic surgery; Thoracic surgical procedures; Patient safety; General surgery.Abstract
Objective: to seek evidence available in the literature on elements that make up checklists for safe cardiac surgery. Methodology: this is an integrative review, carried out between September and October 2020, studies in English, Portuguese and Spanish with a qualitative and quantitative approach that answered the guiding question. Time frame was not used due to the limited number of articles that met the inclusion criteria. This article originated from the research project entitled “Construction and validation of an instrument for care in safe cardiac surgery”, approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Alagoas, and based on the opinion issued under number 15410219.6.0000.5013. Results: the articles included in accordance with the eligibility criteria for the integrative review presented safety elements aimed at surgical specificity, eight articles were found and it was possible to see appropriate items aimed at the surgical safety of cardiac patients. Conclusion: specific items for cardiac surgery were diverse, bringing together clear and objective information regarding safety for cardiac surgical patients.
References
Berrisford, R. G., wilson, I. H., Davidge, M., & Sanders, S. (2012). Surgical time out checklist with debriefing and multidisciplinary feedback improves venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in thoracic surgery: a prospective audit. Eur j cardiothorac surg. 41(6),1326-1329.
Chan, J., Gupta, A. K., Stewart, S., Babidge, W., Mc Culloch, G., Worthington, M. G., & Maddern, G. J. (2019). "Nobody told me": Communication Issues Affecting Australian Cardiothoracic Surgery Patients. The Annals of thoracic surgery, 108(6), 1801–1806.
Hussain, S., Adams, C., Cleland, A., Jones, P., Walsh, G., & Kiaii. B. (2016). Lessons from aviation - the role of checklists in minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Perfusion 31(1), 68-71.
Joanna Briggs Institute. (2014). Reviewers Manual-Methodology for JBI Mixed Methods Systematic Reviews.
Kim, F. J., da Silva, R. D., Gustafson, D., Nogueira, L., Harlin, T., & Paul, D. L. (2015). Current issues in patient safety in surgery: a review. Patient Saf Surg 9 (26).
Konfirst, C., Preston, S., & Yeh, Jr. T. (2015). Checklists and safety in pediatric cardiac surgery. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu 18(1), 43-50.
Mendes, K. D. S., Silveira, R. C.C. P., & Galvão, C. M. (2019). Uso de gerenciador de referências bibliográficas na seleção dos estudos primários em revisão integrativa. Texto contexto - enferm. 28:E20170204.
Ogden, S. R., Culp, Jr. W. C., Villamaria, F. J., & Ball, T. R. (2016). Developing a Checklist: Consensus Via a Modified Delphi. Technique J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 30(4), 855-858.
Organização Mundial da Saúde. (2009). Segundo desafio global para a segurança do paciente: Cirurgias seguras salvam vidas. Rio de Janeiro: Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde/Ministério da Saúde/Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária.
Papaspyros, S. C., Javangula, K. C., & Adluri, R. K. P. (2010). O'Regan DJ. Briefing and debriefing in the cardiac operating room. Analysis of impact on theatre team attitude and patient safety. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 10 (1), 43-47.
Rakoff, D., Akella, K., Guruvegowda, C., Chhajwani, S., Seshadri, S., & Sola, S. (2018). Improved Compliance and Comprehension of a Surgical Safety Checklist With Customized Versus Standard Training: A Randomized Trial. J Patient Saf. 14 (3), 138-142.
Raman, J., Leveson, N., Samost, A. L., Dobrilovic, N., Oldham, M., Dekker, S., & Finkelstein., Stan (2016). When a checklist is not enough: How to improve them and what else is needed. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 152 (2), 585-592.
Russ, S., Rout, S., Caris, J., Mansell, J., Davies, R., Mayer, E., Moorthy, K., Darzi, Ara., Vicent, C., & Sevdalis, N. (2015). Measuring variation in use of the Measuring variation in use of the WHO surgical safety checklist in the operating room: a multicenter prospective cross-sectional study. J Am Coll Surg. 220 (1), 1-11.
Spiess, B. D. (2013). The use of checklists as a method to reduce human error in cardiac operating rooms. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 51(1), 179-194.
Tan, J., Ngwayi, J. R. M., Ding, Z., Zhou, Y., Li, M., Chen, Y., Hu, Bingtao., Liu, Jinping., & Porter, Daniel. (2021). Attitudes and compliance with the WHO surgical safety checklist: a survey among surgeons and operating room staff in 138 hospitals in China. Patient Saf Surg 15 (3).
Thomé, A. R. C. S., Melo, E. S., Silva, V. M. S., Almeida, T. G., Farias, I. P. & Vasconcelos, E. L. (2017). Construção e validação de instrumento para assistência em cirurgia cardíaca segura. Revista de enfermagem UFPE on line.
Thomé, A. R. C. S., Soares, I. P., Bernardo, R. C. C., Santos, S. S. G. S. (2021). Checklist para cirurgia cardíaca segura: revisão integrativa. Research Society and Development 10 (15) e434101523213.
Weiser, T. G., & Gawande, A. (2015). Excess Surgical Mortality: Strategies for Improving Quality of Care. In H. T. Debas (Eds.) et. al., Essential Surgery: Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition (Volume 1). The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank.
World Health Organization. (2011). Patient Safety Curriculum Guide Multi-professional Edition. Geneva.
World Health Organization. (2019). World Patient Safety Day.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Alba Regina Cartaxo Sampaio Thomé; Thaís Honório Lins Bernardo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
