Multiprofessional instrument for tracheal decannulation in adults: content validity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i2.25670Keywords:
Tracheostomy; Weaning; Airway management; Validation study.Abstract
Introduction: Tracheal decannulation needs multiprofessional evaluation observing success predictor criteria. A validated instrument can increase the safety of the procedure, reduce the length of stay and ensure better quality of life. Objective: To develop and perform the content validity of a multiprofessional instrument for tracheal decannulation in adults. Method: Cross-sectional descriptive study, with 24 judges: doctors, physiotherapists, speech therapists and nurses. The instrument was developed and presented through an electronic form where the judges took their notes. The Content Validity Index by item (CVI-I) and total (CVI-T) were calculated to verify evidence of validation. In unverified items, adjustments were made pointed out by the judges and submitted to the new evaluation phase in order to obtain complete validation of the instrument. Results: First evaluation phase, the items: Identification, Ventilatory History, Vital Signs, Consciousness/Collaboration, Ventilatory Data, Opinion and Legend obtained CVI-I > 0.78, were considered validity. The items Muscular Performance and Speech and Swallowing did not obtain adequate validity CVI-I 0.67 and 0.17, respectively. Therefore, they were submitted to the second phase of evaluation. In this phase, these items were validated obtaining CVI-I=0.83 in the item Muscular Performance and CVI-I=1.0 in the item Speech and Swallowing. From the mean of CVI-I, the value CVI-T=0.9 was obtained, validity all the instrument. Conclusion: Multiprofessional instrument that can help in the process of tracheal decannulation in adults was developed and validity in content post two phases of evaluation by a group of expert judges in the area.
References
Avelino, M. A. G., Maunsell, R., Valera, F. C. P., Neto, J. F. L., Schweiger, C., Miura, C. S., Chen, V. G., Manrique, D., Oliveira, R., Gavazzoni, F., Picinin, I. F. de M., Bittencourt, P., Camargos, P., Peixoto, F., Brandão, M. B., Sih, T. M., & Anselmo-Lima, W. T. (2017). Primeiro Consenso Clínico e Recomendações Nacionais em Crianças Traqueostomizadas da Academia Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia Pediátrica (ABOPe) e Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP). Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 83(5), 498–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.06.002
Bernardi, S. A. (2016). Artigo de Revisão Cânulas traqueais e disfagia orofaríngea : uma revisão integrativa da literatura. Revistra Brasileira de Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço, 44, 187–193.
Côrte, M. M. D. da, Vicente, L. C. C., & Friche, A. A. de L. (2019). Decanulação: indicadores sociodemográficos, clínicos e fonoaudiológicos preditivos de sucesso TT - Decannulation: sociodemographic, clinical and speech-language indicators predictive of success. Audiol., Commun. Res, 24, e2103–e2103.
de Medeiros, G. C., Sassi, F. C., Lirani-Silva, C., & de Andrade, C. R. F. (2019). Criteria for tracheostomy decannulation: Literature review. Codas, 31(6), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20192018228
Hausberger, S. C., Gomes, H. R., Leonor, V. D., Gaspar, M. do R. de F., & Santos, R. S. (2016). Proposta de protocolo para decanulação realizada por equipe multidisciplinar. Tuiuti Ciência e Cultura, 52, 11–18.
Hess, D. R., & Altobelli, N. P. (2014). Tracheostomy tubes. Respiratory Care, 59(6), 956–973. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.02920
Hess, D. R., & Faarc, R. (2005). Facilitating Speech in the Patient With a Tracheostomy. Respiratory Care, 50(4), 519–525. http://rc.rcjournal.com/content/respcare/50/4/519.full.pdf
Hosokawa, K., Nishimura, M., Egi, M., & Vincent, J. L. (2015). Timing of tracheotomy in ICU patients: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Critical Care, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-1138-8
Kutsukutsa, J., Kuupiel, D., Monori-Kiss, A., Del Rey-Puech, P., & Mashamba-Thompson, T. P. (2019). Tracheostomy decannulation methods and procedures for assessing readiness for decannulation in adults: A systematic scoping review. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 17(2), 74–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000166
Medeiros, R. K. da S., Júnior, M. A. F., Pinto, D. P. de S. R., Vitor, A. F., Santos, V. E. P., & Barichello, E. (2015). Modelo de validação de conteúdo de Pasquali nas pesquisas em Enfermagem. Revista de Enfermagem Referência, 4(IV), 127–135.
Mendes, F., Ranea, P., & Oliveira, A. C. T. de. (2013). Protocolo de desmame e decanulação de traqueostomia. Revista UNILUS Ensino e Pesquisa, 10(20), 01–12. http://revista.lusiada.br/index.php/ruep/article/viewFile/100/u2013v10n20e69
Mendes, T. de A. B., Cavalheiro, L. V., Arevalo, R. T., & Soneght, R. (2008). Estudo preliminar sobre a proposta de um fluxograma de decanulação em traqueostomia com atuação interdisciplinar. Einstein (São Paulo), 6(1), 1–6.
O’Connor, H. H., & White, A. C. (2010). Tracheostomy decannulation. Respiratory Care, 55(8), 1076–1081.
Oliveira, E. L. De, Rocha, C. R., & Vanvos-sen, M. R. (2017). Critérios Para Decanulação Eficaz: Uma Revisão De Literatura. Movimento e Saúde, 14(47).
Pereira, A.S., Shitsuka D.M., Parreira, F.J., Shitsuka, R. Metodologia da pesquisa cietífica. 1ªed. (2018). Santa Maria/RS.
Pernambuco, L., Espelt, A., Magalhães, H. V., & Lima, K. C. de. (2017). Recommendations for elaboration, transcultural adaptation and validation process of tests in Speech, Hearing and Language Pathology. CoDAS, 29(3), e20160217. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20172016217
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The Content Validity Index : Are You Sure You Know What ’ s Being Reported ? Critique and Recommendations. ResearchinNursing&Health, 29, 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur
Rodrigues, L. B., & Nunes, T. A. (2015). Importância da broncoscopia flexível na decanulação dos pacientes traqueostomizados. Revista Do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes, 42(2), 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-69912015002003
Santus, P., Gramegna, A., Radovanovic, D., Raccanelli, R., Valenti, V., Rabbiosi, D., Vitacca, M., & Nava, S. (2014). A systematic review on tracheostomy decannulation: A proposal of a quantitative semiquantitative clinical score. BMC Pulmonary Medicine, 14(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-14-201
Singh, R. K., Saran, S., & Baronia, A. K. (2017). The practice of tracheostomy decannulation-A systematic review. Journal of Intensive Care, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-017-0234-z
Souza, A. C. de, Alexandre, N. M. C., & Guirardello, E. de B. (2017). Propriedades psicométricas na avaliação de instrumentos: avaliação da confiabilidade e da validade. Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude : Revista Do Sistema Unico de Saude Do Brasil, 26(3), 649–659. https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Paulo Henrique Coltro; Isabel de Lima Zanata; Tatiane Caroline Boumer; Ana Paula de Andrade Sartori; Rosane Sampaio Santos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
