Knowledge of Cryptocurrency from a student perspective

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i8.30525

Keywords:

Cryptocurrency; Bitcoin; Accounting Sciences.

Abstract

This study has the general objective of identifying the constitutive factors of the level of knowledge on the topic “Cryptocurrency and its form of taxation”. Specifically, it is intended to understand its acceptance and accounting, from the perspective of undergraduate students in Accounting Sciences, at a Federal University located in the interior of Mato Grosso do Sul. Therefore, based on descriptive statistics, we used quantitative data obtained through a questionnaire, prepared and applied to all students of the course. As a theoretical framework, we worked with researchers such as: Ackermann (2018), Chuen, Guo and Wang (2017), Ciaian et al. (2016), Lakomski-Laguerre and Desmedt (2015), Ramos (2017). Results obtained allowed, through analysis, the understanding of the evaluation averages of the variables of greatest significance: cryptocurrency presents high volatility; in Brazil there are no specific rules regarding the accounting treatment to be applied in operations that use Cryptocurrency; Accounting must consider that Cryptocurrency is, at the same time, an asset for those who carry it and a liability for those who issue it. Still, it was possible to highlight that acceptance is low and that the topic lacks regulation in the country. Finally, it is suggested that the subject deserves further research aimed at expanding knowledge on this subject.

Author Biographies

Marçal Rogério Rizzo, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul

Professor at (UFMS) Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Três Lagoas campus.

Geraldo Luiz Filho , Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul

Teacher at (UFMS) Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Três Lagoas campus.

Sirlei Tonello Tisott, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul

Teacher at (UFMS) Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul.

João Pedro Rojas de Lima, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul

Graduated in Accounting Sciences from (UFMS) Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul.

Lara Vitória Pereira Rocha, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul

Graduated in Accounting Sciences from (UFMS) Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul.

References

Ackermann, F. (2018). Introdução as criptomoedas: uma análise de possíveis impactos na economia, investimentos e contabilidade. Monografia apresentada na Universidade de Caxias do Sul. 1- 76. https://repositorio.ucs.br/11338/4314.

Alves, A. (2017). Teoria da Contabilidade. Sagah Educação.

Assaf Neto, A. (2010). Estrutura e análise de balanços. Atlas.

Bell, S. (2001). The role of the state and the hierarchy of money. Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge, (25), 149-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2015.02.029.

Projeto de Lei nº. 3825. (2019). Que dispõe sobre disciplina os serviços referentes a operações realizadas com criptoativos em plataformas eletrônicas de negociação. https://www25.senado.leg.br/web/atividade/materias/-/materia/137512.

Chuen, D. L. K., Guo, L., & Wang, Y. (2017). Cryptocurrency: A new investment opportunity? Journal of Alternative Investments. Singapore: University of Singapore. 20 (3) (2018), 16-40. Recuperado em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.006.

Ciaian, P., Rajcaniova, M., & Kancs, D. (2016). The economics of Bitcoin price formation. Applied Economics, 48(19), 1799-1815. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2015.1109038.

Costa, J. T. F., & Costa, V. S. (2022). Brazilian Journal of Development, 8(2), 10200-10206.

Cpc. Cômite de pronunciamentos contábeis. CPC 00-R1 – Pronunciamento Conceitual Básico – Estrutura Conceitual para a Elaboração e Apresentação das Demonstrações Contábeis. http://conteudo.cvm.gov.br/export/sites/cvm/menu/regulados/normascontabeis/cpc/CPC_00_R1_Consolidado.pdf.

Feld, S., Schönfeld, M., & Martin, W. (2014). Analyzing the deployment of Bitcoin’s P2P network under an AS-level perspective. Procedia Computer Science, (32), 1121– 1126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.542.

Governo Federal – Instrução Normativa RFB n°. 2010. (2021). https://www.in.gov.br/web/dou/-/instrucao-normativa-rfb-n-2.010-de-24-de-fevereiro-de-2021-305280906.

Gonçalves, C. B. (1984). Casa da Moeda do Brasil: 290 anos de história. 1694-1984. Casa da MoedaImprinta.

Gross, A. (2015). Accounting issues related to accepting bitcoins.Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies, 21(3), 71 - p. 74. 10.1002/jcaf.22016.

Gupta, M. (2017). Blockchain for Dummies IBM Limited Edition. 1. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Iudicibus, S. de. et. al. (2010). Manual de contabilidade societária: aplicável a todas as sociedades: de acordo com as normas internacionais e do CPC. São Paulo: 1. Atlas.

Katz, J., & Lindell, Y. (2007). Introduction to Modern Cryptography. 1. CRC PRESS.

Lakomski-Laguerre, O., & Desmedt, L. (2015). L’alternativemonétaireBitcoin: une perspective institutionnaliste. Revue de larégulation. nº 18/2. 10.4000/regulation.11489.

Marçal, R. R., Prata, B. C., & Flach, L. (2020). Is Bitcoin an Opportunity or a Threat to the Relevance of Accounting Information? Revista Mineira de Contabilidade, 21(1), 46-55. revista.crcmg.org.br/index.php?journal=rmc.

Ministério da Fazenda. Imposto sobre a Renda – Pessoa Física Perguntas e Respostas, exercício de 2017. <http://receita.economia.gov.br/interface/cidadao/irpf/2017/perguntao/pir-pf-2017-perguntas-e-respostas-versao-1-1-03032017.pdf>

Ministério da Fazenda. Receita Federal Do Brasil (2017). Imposto sobre a renda da pessoa física: Perguntas & respostas. <http://receita.economia.gov.br/interface/cidadao/irpf/2017/perguntao/pir-pf-2017-perguntas-e-respostas-versao-1-1-03032017.pdf>

Murphy, H. (2018). «Who reallyownsbitcoinnow?». Financial Times.

Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. in Consultad, 1, 01- 28. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.

Nascimento, K. K. F. do, Santos, F. S. dos, Jale, J. da S., & Ferreira, T. A. E. (2020). Behavior of financial agents in an artificial market developed with the Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm. Research, Society and Development, 9(7), e285974216. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i7.4216.

Ramos, A. L. S. C. (2017). Direito Empresarial Esquematizado. 7. Lugar: Editora Método.

Roth, N. (2015). An architectural assessment of Bitcoin: using the System Modeling Language. Procedia Computer Science, 44, 527-536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.066.

Ulrich, F. (2014). Bitcoin: a moeda na era digital. 1. Instituto Ludwig Von Mises. Venter, H. (2016). Digital currency – A case for standard setting activity. A perspective by the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB). https://www.aasb.gov.au/admin/file/content102/c3/AASB_ASAF_DigitalCurrency.pdf.

Wyatt, A. (2005). Accounting Recognition of Intangible Assets: theory and evidence on economic determinants. The Accounting Review, 80(3): 967–1003. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2005.80.3.967.

Zogbi, P. (2016). Bitcoins não são consideradas moedas, mas devem constar na declaração de IR. INFOMONEY.

Yermack, D. (2013). Is Bitcoin a real currency? An economic appraisal. NBER Working Papers. https://www.banrep.gov.co/sites/default/files/publicaciones/archivos/be_819.pdf.

Published

21/06/2022

How to Cite

RIBEIRO, S. P.; RIZZO, M. R. .; LUIZ FILHO , G. .; TISOTT, S. T. .; LIMA, J. P. R. de; ROCHA, L. V. P. . Knowledge of Cryptocurrency from a student perspective. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 11, n. 8, p. e34011830525, 2022. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v11i8.30525. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/30525. Acesso em: 22 nov. 2024.

Issue

Section

Human and Social Sciences