The cartography of controversy applied to the "production x protection" factor: epistemological considerations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i11.33378Keywords:
Actor-Network Theory; “Production versus Protection”; Cartography of Controversy; Accident prevention.Abstract
The present work intends to provide theoretical-methodological contributions through the cartography of the controversy applied to the factor “production x protection”; from the considerations of Bruno Latour's Actor-Network Theory (2012). It seeks to reflect on the methodological possibilities of the Actor-Network Theory to address the conflicts of “production versus protection” in industrial production. Understand the perspectives of safety within a productive system oriented towards maximum efficiency and the question of acceptable management of human error or accidents in work performance, according to the understanding of Jens Rasmussen (1997) about the socio-technological system involved in the management of risks in the productive dynamics. Relate the technical-scientific progress associated with the actors of the industry in view of the presentation of the “production versus protection” cartography of controversy. Therefore, the objective is to identify the possibilities of a research agenda and its potential in this study to identify alternatives for accident prevention.
References
Almeida, I. M. (2006). Trajetória da análise de acidentes: o paradigma tradicional e os primórdios da ampliação da análise. Interface – Comunic, Saúde, Educ, 9(18), 185-202.
Alves, G. (2007). Dimensões da Reestruturação Produtiva – ensaios de sociologia do trabalho. (2ª ed.). Londrina (PR): Práxis/Bauru (SP), Canal 6.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: towards a new modernity. SAGE Publications, Newbury Park.
Bernstein, P. L. (1997). Desafio aos Deuses. A Fascinante História do Risco. (Trad. I. Korytowski). Rio de Janeiro: Campus.
Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops the fisherman of St Brieuc Bay. In: Law J. Editor. Power action and belief a new sociology of knowledge. Londres (UK): Routledge.
Cerreto, C., & Domenico, S. M. R. (2016). Mudança e Teoria Ator-Rede: humanos e não humanos em controvérsias na implementação de um centro de serviços compartilhados. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 14(1), Art. 5.
Feenberg, A. (1996). Marcuse or Habermas: Two critiques of technology. Inquiry, 39(1), 45-70.
Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1990). Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy. Dordrecht, N. L.: Kluwer.
Haastrup, P., & Funtowicz, S. O. (1992). Accident generating systems and chaos: a dynamic study of accident time series. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 35, 31- 37.
Harvey, D. (2008). Condição Pós-Moderna – uma pesquisa sobre as origens da mudança cultural. (17ª ed.). São Paulo: Loyola.
Heloani, J. R. (2003). Gestão e Organização no Capitalismo Globalizado – história da manipulação psicológica no mundo do trabalho, São Paulo: Atlas.
Latour, B. (1994). Jamais fomos modernos: ensaios de antropologia simétrica. Rio de Janeiro: Editora 34.
Law, J. (1992). Notes on the Theory of the Actor Network: Ordering, Strategy and Heterogeneity. Centre of Science Studies, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YN.
Law, J. et al. (1999). Actor network theory and after. Nova Jersey: Blackwell Publishing.
Lieber, R. R., & Romano-Lieber, N. S. R. (2002). O conceito de risco: Janus reinventado. In: Minayo, Mcs., & Miranda, A. C.(Orgs.). Saúde e ambiente sustentável: estreitando nós. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FIOCRUZ, 68-111.
Marchi, B. de., Funtowicz, S., & Ravetz, J. (2000). O Acidente Industrial Ampliado de Seveso: paradigma e paradoxo. In: Freitas, C. M., Porto, M. F. S., & Machado, J. M. H. (Orgs.). Acidentes industriais ampliados: desafios e perspectivas para o controle e a prevenção. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FIOCRUZ, 128-148.
Marshall, E. (1992). Study Casts Doubt on Hiroshima Data. Science.
Merton, R. (1968). Structure Sociale et Anomie. ln: Psychologie Sociale. Paris, Dunod.
Merton, R. K. (2004). Teoria y Estrutura Sociales. México: FCE.
Navarro, M. V. T. (2009). Conceito e controle de riscos à saúde. In: Risco, radiodiagnóstico e vigilância sanitária. Salvador: EDUFBA, 37-75.
Nogueira, L. S. M., & Marin, R. E. A. (2013). Segurança e saúde dos trabalhadores na indústria do alumínio no estado do Pará, Brasil. Centro de Estudios del Desarrollo. Cuadernos del CENDES, 30(82), terceira época, 109- 134.
Pedro, R. M. L. R. (2005). Tecnologias de vigilância: um estudo psicossocial a partir da análise das controvérsias. Anais do XXIX Encontro anual da ANPOCS, realizado em Caxambu (MG), de 25 a 29 de outubro de 2005. Recuperado em 25 de jul. 2022 de: https://anpocs.com/index.php/papers-29-encontro/gt-25/gt24-13/3853-rpedro
tecnologias/file.
Perrow, C. (1984). Normal Accidents: living with high-risk technologies. Nova York: Basic Books.
Pigott, R. (1997). Advanced probabilistic design of multi-degree of freedom systems subjected to a number of discreet excitation frequencies. Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis (SERA) - Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis Division, ASME, 7, 25-30.
Rasmussen, J. (1997). Risk management in a dynamic society: a modeling problem. Safety Science, 27(2-3), 183-213.
Ruppenthal, J. E. (2013). Gerenciamento de riscos. Santa Maria: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Colégio Técnico Industrial de Santa Maria.
Sevá Filho, A. O. (1997). Riscos Técnicos Coletivos e Desorganização do Trabalho: alarmes e emergências na indústria petrolífera brasileira, em seu transe de mundialização. Campinas: UNICAMP.
Silva, A. J. N., Almeida, I. M., Vilela, R. A. G., Mendes, R. W. B., & Hurtado, S. L. B. (2018). Acidentes de trabalho e os religadores automáticos no setor elétrico: para além das causas imediatas. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 34(05).
Sims, J. R., & Feigel, R. E. (2000). Use of risk-based approaches in post-construction standards. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, Transactions of the ASME, 122 (3), p. 247-54.
Turner, B. A. (1978). Man-Made Disasters. Londres: Wykeham.
Venturini, T. (2010). Diving in magma: how to explore controversies with Actor Network Theory. Public Understanding of Science, 20(1).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Joana Josiane Andriotte Oliveira Lima Nyland
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
