Cultural adaptation and reproducibility of Bristol COPD Knowledge Questionnaire in patients with cronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i13.33913Keywords:
COPD; Questionnaires; Knowledge.Abstract
In recent years, there has been a growing emphasis on patients and their families' education on their medical conditions. This has led patients to want more information about their conditions, and in part, health professionals have recognized that a certain self-control of the disease is important for patients. The general objective of this study was to adapt to the Brazilian culture and evaluate the reproducibility of the Bristol COPD Knowledge Questionnaire in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The present study dealt with an original questionnaire composed of 65 questions was translated into Portuguese by a professional with mastery in The English language. This first version underwent cultural adaptation. Next, the version adapted to eight patients who answered the questionnaire and evaluated the difficulties with the translated words was evaluated. Next, the version adapted to eight patients who answered the questionnaire and evaluated the difficulties with the translated words was evaluated. This second version in Portuguese culturally adapted underwent a retrograde translation into English by another American translator with mastery in both languages. This English version was compared with the original version by the researchers and then by the author of the original questionnaire. The ICC value of 0.83 was found for the overall evaluation of the two applications of the questionnaire. Evaluated separately, six domains presented the ICC above 0.70, four between 0.60 - 0.69 and three below 0.60. The lowest agreement was observed in the domain regarding etiology and the highest, in oral corticosteroids. We conclude that the Bristol Questionnaire adapted to the Portuguese language of Brazil is easy to understand by patients with COPD and proved to be reproducible.
References
Black, L. F., Mitchell, M. M. (1977). Evaluation of a patient education program for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Mayo Clin Proc, 52(2), 106-11.
Celli, B. R. (1995). Pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 152(3), 861-4.
Chen, K. H, et al (2008). Self-management behaviours for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a qualitative study. J Adv Nurs, 64(6), 595-604.
Dawson, B., Trapp, R. G. (2003). Bioestatística básica e clínica. 3.ed. Rio de Janeiro : McGraw Hill, 348p.
Franchi, K. M. B., et al. (2008). Estudo comparativo do conhecimento e prática de atividade física de idosos diabéticos tipo 2 e não diabéticos Rev. Bras. Geriatr. Gerontol, 11(3), 327-339.
Frente Parlamentar em Defesa da Atividade Física [Texto na internet], citado em 04 de agosto de 2022. Disponível em http://www.fpdatividadefisica.com.br.
Gallefoss, F., Bakke, P. S., Rsgaard, P. K. (1999). Quality of life assessment after patient education in a randomized controlled study on asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 159(3), 812-7.
Lottermann, P. C., Sousa, C. A. de; Liz, C. M. (2017). Programas de exercício físico para pessoas com dpoc: uma revisão sistemática. Arq. Cienc. Saúde UNIPAR, Umuarama, 21(1), 65-75.
Maricoto T, et al. (2016) Educational interventions to improve inhaler techniques and their impact on asthma and COPD control: a pilot effectiveness-implementation trial. J Bras Pneumol, 42(6), 440-3.
Matsudo, S. M., et al. (2002). Nível de atividade física da população do Estado de São Paulo: análise de acordo com o gênero, idade, nível socioeconômico, distribuição geográfica e de conhecimento, Rev. Bras. Ciên. e Mov. Brasília, 4(10), 41-50.
Monninkhof, E. M, et al. (2003). Self-management education for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review, 58(5), 394-8.
Netzer, N, et al. (1996). "Open-word" questions: an effective tool in gauging education of patients with COPD. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis, 51(1), 74-6.
Programa Agita São Paulo [Texto na internet], citado em 22 de julho de 2022. Disponível em https://celafiscs.org.br/programa-agita-sao-paulo.
Programa Academia da Saúde [Texto na internet], citado em 06 de agosto de 2022. Disponível no Portal da Secretaria de Atenção Primária à Saúde (saude.gov.br).
Ries, A. L., et al. (1995). Effects of pulmonar rehabilitation on physiologic and psychosocial outcomes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Intern Med, 122(11), 823-32.
Souza, H. V. P, et al. (2020). Conhecimento sobre doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica em pacientes de diferentes níveis de atividade física. Rev. Eletr. Enferm, 22, 576-37.
Shrout, P. E., Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.Psychol Bull, 86(2), 420-8.
Stewart, D. G., et al. (2001). Benefits of an inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program: a prospective analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 82(3), 347-52.
Toshima, M. T., Kaplan, R. M., Ries, A. L. (1990). Experimental evaluation of rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: short-term effects on exercise endurance and health status. Health Psychol, 9(3), 237-52.
Tougaard, L., et al. (1992). Economic benefits of teaching patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease about their illness. Lancet, 20(8808), 1517-20.
Wedzicha, J. A., et al. (1998). Randomized controlled trial of pulmonar rehabilitation in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary diseasepatients, stratified with the MRC dyspnoea scale. Eur Respir, 12(2), 363-9.
Worth H, Dhein Y. (2004). Does patient education modify behaviour in the management of COPD? Patient Educ Couns, 52(3), 267-70.
White, R., et al. (2006). Bristol COPD Knowledge Questionnaire (BCKQ): testing what we teach patients about COPD. Chron Respir Dis, 3(3), 123-31.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Elenildo Aquino dos Santos; Oliver A. Nascimento ; George Márcio da Costa e Souza; Evandro Guimarães de Souza; José R. Jardim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
