Implementation of taipa de pilão as an alternative construction system, as to its environmental impact
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i13.35782Keywords:
Life cycle analysis; Environmental impacts; Pestle rammed earth.Abstract
This work evaluated the potential environmental effects of the rammed earth construction technique, taking into account several configurations typically found in Brazil. Three Portland cement contents were evaluated: 5%, 10% and 15%. (in large scale). The phases of production and transport of materials, construction and completion of Taipa's life cycle were considered through the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology. The various configurations of the rammed earth systems were contrasted with a masonry of structural ceramic blocks, structural concrete blocks and locally cast concrete walls. The calculated indices showed that the rammed earth is more advantageous, especially when the thermal capacity and the calculated sound reduction index are taken into account when choosing the functional unit. taipam were cement production and wood type. Therefore, it was possible to determine the potential life cycle environmental effects of this construction technique, which were parameterized by wall and cement thickness, with regression-derived equations being presented. Recommendations were also made to improve the environmental impact of rammed earth amid current environmental problems.
References
Arrigoni, A., Beckett, C., Ciancio, D., & Dotelli, G. (2017). Life cycle analysis of environmental impact vs. durability of stabilised rammed earth. Construction and Building Materials, 142, 128–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.066
ABNT. (2009). NBR ISO 14040: Gestão ambiental - Avaliação do ciclo de vida - Princípios e estrutura. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas (ABNT).
ABNT. (2005). NBR 15220 - 2: Desempenho térmico de edificações. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas (ABNT).
ABNT. (2022). NBR 17014: Taipa de pilão – Requisitos, procedimentos e controle. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas (ABNT).
ABNT. (2013). NBR 15575 - 4: Edificações Habitacionais – Desempenho. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas (ABNT).
Cordeiro, C. C. M., Brandão, D. Q., Durante, L. C., & Callejas, I. J. A. (2019). Construções vernáculas em terra: perspectiva histórica, técnica e contemporânea da taipa de mão. PARC Pesquisa Em Arquitetura E Construção, 10, e019006–e019006. https://doi.org/10.20396/parc.v10i0.8651212
Caldas, L. R., Filho, R. D. T., Martins, A. P. S., & Paiva, R. L. M. (2020). Argamassas de te rra x convencionais: validação do desempenho ambiental considerado no ciclo de vi da. MIX Sustentável. 6(4). https://ojs.sites.ufsc.br/index.php/mixsustentavel/article/view/4120
Caldas, L. R., Filho, R. D. T., & Martins, A. P. S. (2021). Construção com terra no Brasil: Avaliação ambiente de taipa de pilão. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353166958_Construcao_com_terra_no_Brasil_avaliacao_ambiental_da_taipa_de_pilao.
Castro, V. M., et al. (2016) ACVE e diferentes formas para paredes de concreto moldadas no local. Encontro nacional de tecnologia do ambiente construído. 16. São Paulo.
Christoforou, E., Kylili, A., Fokaides, P. A., & Ioannou, I. (2016). Cradle to site Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of adobe bricks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.016
Jiang, B., Wu, T., Xia, W., & Liang, J. (2020). Hygrothermal performance of rammed earth wall in Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture in Sichuan Province of China. Building and Environment, 181, 107128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107128
Lopes, C. A. et al. (2016). Medição de manifestações patológicas em paredes de taipa e le vantamento dos desperdícios decorrentes. Congresso de arquitetura e construcão com terra no brasil, São Paulo.
Maniatidis, V., & Walker, P. (2003). A Review of Rammed Earth Construction for DTi Partners in Innovation Project “Developing Rammed Earth for UK Housing.” https://people.bath.ac.uk/abspw/rammedearth/review.pdf
Marcelino-Sadaba, S., Kinuthia, J., Oti, J., & Seco Meneses, A. (2017). Challenges in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of stabilised clay-based construction materials. Applied Clay Science, 144, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2017.05.012
Paiva, A., Caldas, L., Paiva, R. & Filho, R. D. T. (2018). Avaliação do cicIo de vida de compósitos solo, cimento e fibras de si saI considerando diferentes distâncias de transporte. Congresso de arquitetura e construcão com terra no brasil, Rio de Janeiro.
Melià, P., Ruggieri, G., Sabbadini, S., & Dotelli, G. (2014). Environmental impacts of natural and conventional building materials: a case study on earth plasters. Journal of Cleaner Production, 80, 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.073
Milani, A. P. S. (2008). Avaliacão física, mecânica e térmica do material solo, cimento e cinza de Casca de Arroz e Seu Desempenho Como Parede Monolítica. Tese de Dou torado. Universidade Estadual de Campinas Faculdade de Engenharia Agrícola. https://www.academicoo.com/artigo/avaliacao-fisica-mecanica-e-termica-do-ma terial-solo-cimento-cinza-de-casca-de-arroz-e-seu-desempenho-como-pa rede-monolitica-physical-mechanical-and-thermal-evaluation-of-material-soil-cement-ri ce-husk-ash-and-its-performance-on-monolithic-wall.
Miranda, A. & Yuba, A. N. (2016). Comparativo de impactos ambientais de s istemas construtivos de paredes utilizando avaliação do ciclo de vida moduIar. Encontro nacional de tecnologia do ambiente construído, 16., 2016, São Paulo. Anais[...] Porto Alegre: ANTAC.
Neves, C., & Borges Faria, Obede (2011) Técnicas de construção com terra. Bauru : FEB-UNESP / PROTERRA. (n.d.). https://www.athuar.uema.br/?page_id=469
Pacheco-Torgal, F., & Jalali, S. (2012). Earth construction: Lessons from the past for future eco-efficient construction. Construction and Building Materials, 29, 512–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.10.054
Peixoto, M. V. S., Souza, L. A. C. & Rezende, M. A. P. (2016). O acervo em taipa de pilão em Minas Gerais e novas estratégias de conservacão. Congresso de ar quitetura e construcão com terra no brasil, 6, 2016, Porto. Anais [...]. Bauru: São Paulo.
Pinheiro, L., Rangel, B., Guimarães, A., & Silva, A. (2016). Panorama de producão de obras em terra crua com design contemporâneo em 60 anos no Brasil [Review of Panorama de producão de obras em terra crua com design contemporâneo em 60 anos no Brasil]. Congresso Internacional de História Da Construcão Luso Brasileira, Porto.
Pisani, M. A. J. (2004). Taipas: a arquitetura de terra. Sinergia Revista do Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 5(1). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271829655_TAI PAS_A_ARQUITETURA_DE_TERRA.
Maia de Souza, D., Lafontaine, M., Charron-Doucet, F., Chappert, B., Kicak, K., Duarte, F., & Lima, L. (2016). Comparative life cycle assessment of ceramic brick, concrete brick and cast-in-place reinforced concrete exterior walls. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.069
Vieira, G. (2022). Taipa de pilão em sistema construtivo híbrido, Pirenópolis – Go [Review of Taipa de pilão em sistema construtivo híbrido, Pirenópolis – Go]. In Instagram.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Vitor Smayder Nunes Barros; Noam Alves Martins Marson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
