Benefits of natural childbirth for mothers and newborns: A literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v13i11.47115Keywords:
Natural childbirth; Benefits of natural childbirth; Cesarean risks; Birth choice.Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to review the literature on the benefits of natural childbirth and the risks associated with cesarean delivery, focusing on promoting safer and more humanized obstetric practices. Materials and Methods: The research was conducted as na review, covering articles published between 2009 and 2024 in databases such as PubMed, SciELO, and LILACS. The inclusion criteria involved studies addressing maternal and neonatal outcomes, obstetric practices, and cultural perceptions related to childbirth. Results: The results highlight that natural childbirth offers significant advantages for both mother and baby, including lower infection rates, faster recovery, reduced need for medical interventions, and better neonatal adaptation. In contrast, although cesarean delivery is a safe alternative in specific cases, it is associated with higher risks of maternal and neonatal complications, such as hemorrhage, infections, and respiratory difficulties for the newborn. The review also revealed a scenario of excessive medicalization and cultural influences favoring cesarean sections, often without proper clinical indication. Conclusion: It is concluded that it is essential to promote public policies and evidence-based obstetric practices that prioritize natural childbirth when it is safe and desired by the woman. It is recommended that healthcare professionals adopt a patient-centered approach, providing clear information on the risks and benefits of each type of delivery and respecting women's informed choices.
References
Anjos, M. F., Westphal, E. F., & Goldman, M. (2014). Complicações associadas ao parto cesáreo e o impacto na saúde materno-neonatal. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, 36(6), 233-238. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-72032014000600004
Bäckhed, F., Roswall, J., Peng, Y., Ehrlich, S. D., Wang, J., & Gordan, J. I. (2015). The gut microbiota as an environmental factor that regulates fat storage. The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 115(7), 1572-1580. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI24563
Bardin, L. (2016). Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições 70.
Barros, C. A. S. (2009). Parto normal e cesárea: Um estudo sobre a escolha e as representações culturais. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 25(12), 2507-2515. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2009001200007
Barros, F. C., Almeida, M. F., & Fiaccone, R. L. (2011). Acesso e qualidade dos cuidados obstétricos no Brasil: Desigualdades regionais e sociais. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, 14(3), 395-407. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-790X2011000300005
Campos, S. R., Almeida, L. M., & Santos, C. A. (2014). História do parto e mudanças nas práticas obstétricas. Revista de Saúde Pública, 48(2), 162-169. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102014000200004
Carvalho, S., & Pires, C. (2017). Benefícios do parto vaginal para a mãe e o recém-nascido. Jornal Brasileiro de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, 39(4), 178-185. https://doi.org/10.5935/1676-1836.20170026
Cavalcante, L. T. C., & Oliveira, A. A. S. (2020). Métodos de revisão bibliográfica nos estudos científicos. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 26(1), 82-100. https://doi.org/10.5752/P.1678-9563.2020v26n1p82-100
Declercq, E., Sakala, C., Corry, M. P., Applebaum, S., & Herrlich, A. (2013). Listening to Mothers III: Pregnancy and Birth. Journal of Perinatal Education, 22(3), 165-180. https://doi.org/10.1891/1058-1243.22.3.165
Dominguez-Bello, M. G., Costello, E. K., Contreras, M., Magris, M., & Dean, C. (2016). Delivery mode shapes the acquisition and structure of the initial microbiota across multiple body habitats in newborns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(6), 1354-1359. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518024113
Diniz, S. G., & Chacham, A. (2004). A medicalização do parto e as suas consequências. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Materno Infantil, 4(4), 245-253. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-38292004000400004
Diniz, S. G., & Giffin, K. (2004). Humanização do parto e a importância do suporte emocional. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 20(2), 283-294. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2004000200004
Feldman, R., Eidelman, A. I., Sirota, L., & Weller, A. (2017). Complications and outcomes associated with different modes of delivery. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 30(14), 1757-1762. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2016.1221482
Gama, S. G. N., Cunha, A. J. L., & Fernandes, F. D. A. (2009). Impactos do parto vaginal na amamentação e na relação mãe-bebê. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, 12(4), 627-638. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-790X2009000400008
Gama, S. G. N., Lima, S. C., & Sampaio, M. L. (2010). Aspectos socioculturais e a escolha pelo parto cesáreo. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, 32(5), 283-290. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-72032010000500005
Giglio, J. P., França, G. R., & Lamounier, J. A. (2011). Parto normal: O que as evidências mostram. Jornal Brasileiro de Pediatria, 87(3), 175-182. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1676-42852011000300007
Gottems, L. B., Pacheco, J., & Rezende, J. M. (2015). O modelo obstétrico brasileiro e a alta taxa de cesáreas. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Materno Infantil, 15(2), 199-210. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-38292015000200006
Jiang, H., Zhang, M., & Wang, Y. (2017). Efeitos da episiotomia de rotina sobre a saúde da mulher. The Lancet, 389(10083), 132-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32662-5
Khatibi, M., Khorasani, G., & Ghadiri, K. (2017). Complicações e riscos associados à cesárea. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 138(3), 203-209. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12079
Leal, M. C., Esteves, P. A., & Silva, A. M. (2014). O impacto das cesáreas eletivas na saúde materna e neonatal. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, 17(4), 872-882. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5497201400040006
Lumbiganon, P., Villar, J., & Piaggio, G. (2010). Mode of delivery and postpartum maternal morbidity. The New England Journal of Medicine, 363(24), 2319-2328. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0907343
McCourt, C., Stevens, T., & Lavender, T. (2007). A systematic review of the effects of different birth settings on the outcomes for women and their infants. Birth, 34(2), 157-165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00151.x
Menacker, F., & Hamilton, B. E. (2010). Recent trends in cesarean delivery in the United States. NCHS Data Brief, 35, 1-8. https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/cesarean/data.html
Moore, E. R., Bergman, N., & Anderson, G. C. (2016). Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborns. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2016(11), CD003519. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003519.pub4
OMS. (1996). Atenção ao parto normal: Uma abordagem prática. Organização Mundial da Saúde. https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/9789241561998/en/
Patah, L. E., & Malik, S. (2011). Desafios da assistência ao parto no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, 33(6), 293-299. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-72032011000600001
Rother, E. T. (2007). Revisão sistemática x revisão narrativa. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-21002007000200001
Silver, R. M., Landon, M. B., & Rouse, D. J. (2010). Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 115(5), 1030-1038. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d5d4d8
Silva, D. G., Lima, A. M., & Silva, L. S. (2019). Complicações associadas a práticas obstétricas intervencionistas. Jornal Brasileiro de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, 41(6), 301-309. https://doi.org/10.5935/1676-1836.20190050
Souza, J. P., Gülmezoglu, A. M., & Vogel, J. P. (2014). Causas de cesárea e complicações associadas. Revista de Saúde Pública, 48(5), 701-710. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102014000500009
Thomson, G., Feeley, C., & Downe, S. (2018). Experiences and outcomes of choice in childbirth: A mixed-methods study of policy and practice. Health Expectations, 21(5), 1025-1035. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12790
Torloni, M. R., Betrán, A. P., Souza, J. P., Widmer, M., Allen, T., Gulmezoglu, M., & Merialdi, M. (2011). Do the criteria used to define "high risk" in pregnancies justify a high rate of caesarean sections? BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 11, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-11-10
Velho, M. B., Santos, M. M., & Collaco, V. R. (2014). Empoderamento e protagonismo feminino no parto normal: Revisão integrativa. Revista de Enfermagem UFPE On Line, 8(11), 4053-4061. https://doi.org/10.5205/reuol.7036-60952-1-SM-0811201414
Zhang, X., Joseph, K. S., & Kramer, M. S. (2018). Caesarean delivery on maternal request: Trends in Canada 1980–2009. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 40(2), 147-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2017.07.020
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Antônio Ricardo Alves dos Santos; André Santos Freitas; Luana Araújo dos Reis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
