Final irrigation protocols in endodontics: A narrative review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v14i5.48837Keywords:
Root Canal Irrigants; Therapeutic Irrigation; Endodontics.Abstract
This study is a narrative literature review aimed at analyzing the various final irrigation protocols currently used in endodontics, highlighting their characteristics, advantages, and limitations. It is a qualitative, retrospective, and descriptive review based on searches conducted in the PubMed, LILACS, and SciELO databases, including publications in Portuguese and English. Seven irrigation techniques were identified and compared: Conventional Irrigation (CI), Manual Dynamic Activation (MDA), Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation (PUI), Continuous Ultrasonic Irrigation (CUI), EasyClean Activation (ECA), XP Endo Finisher, and Sonic Irrigation. CI showed limitations in smear layer removal and complete canal disinfection. Although effective, MDA may lead to debris compaction. Ultrasonic techniques demonstrated high efficacy in debris removal but may pose a risk of tissue damage. Sonic irrigation and EasyClean activation emerged as promising alternatives, with effective biofilm removal and lower risk to periapical tissues. The study concludes that ECA and XP Endo Finisher are promising techniques. Technique selection should be case-specific. Periodic reviews and clinical studies are essential to keep up with advancements and ensure optimal patient care. Collaboration among researchers, clinicians, and manufacturers is crucial for the continuous development of endodontics.
References
Abbas, B., Ahsin, E., Asghar, S., Habib, F., Ishaq, H., & Allah, N. (2024). Effect of the irrigation agitation technique on postoperative pain in teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.61331.
Abdelhafeez, M. M., Alharbi, A. S., Srivastava, S., Abdelaziz, R., Eldwakhly, E., Almohareb, R. A., … & Soliman, M. (2023). Assessment of penetrability for different endodontic irrigation activating techniques using cone-beam computed tomography and periapical digital radiography—an in vitro study. Applied Sciences, 13(13), 7436. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13137436.
Ahuja, P., et al. (2014). Effectiveness of Four Different Final Irrigation Activation Techniques on Smear Layer Removal in Curved Root Canals: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study. Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. 2014; 11(1), 1-9.
Alqutaibi, A., Hamadallah, H., Aloufi, A., Qurban, H., Hakeem, M., & Alghauli, M. (2024). Contemporary applications and future perspectives of robots in endodontics: a scoping review. International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 20(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.70001.
Andrabi, S., et al. (2014). Effect of passive ultrasonic irrigation and manual dynamic irrigation on smear layer removal from root canals in a closed apex in vitro model. Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry. 2014; 5(3), 188–193.
Baldasso, F., Roleto, L., Silva, V., Morgental, R., & Kopper, P. (2017). Effect of final irrigation protocols on microhardness reduction and erosion of root canal dentin. Braz Oral Res. 2017; 31, e40. Published 2017 May 15. doi:10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0040. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28513789/.
Ballal, N., Gandhi, P., Shenoy, P., & Dummer, P. (2020). Evaluation of various irrigation activation systems to eliminate bacteria from the root canal system: a randomized controlled single blinded trial. Journal of Dentistry. 2020; 99:103412.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103412 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103412
Bao, P., Shen, Y., Lin, J., & Haapasalo, M. (2017). In vitro efficacy of XP-endo finisher with 2 different protocols on biofilm removal from apical root canals. Journal of Endodontics. 2017;43(2), 321-325. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.09.021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.09.021
Boutsikou, C., et al. (2010). Evaluation of Irrigant Flow in the Root Canal Using Different Needle Types by an Unsteady Computational Fluid Dynamics Model. Journal of Endodontics. 2010;36(5), 875–879.
Boutsikou, C., et al. (2010). The effect of needle-insertion depth on the irrigant flow in the root canal: Evaluation using an unsteady computational fluid dynamics model. Journal of Endodontics. 2010;36(10), 1664–1668.
Brinza, C., Sălceanu, M., Melian, A., Tărăboanţă, I., Cimpoeşu, R., Giuroiu, C., … & Andrian, S. (2025). Evaluation by scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive x‐ray spectroscopy of the effects of root canal instrumentation on the radicular dentine. Microscopy Research and Technique, 88(5), 1555-1565. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.24763
Cangelosi, G., & Meschke, J. (2014). Dead or alive: molecular assessment of microbial viability. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2014;80(19), 5884-5891. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01763-14 https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01763-14
Casarin, S. T. et al. (2020). Tipos de revisão de literatura: considerações das editoras do Journal of Nursing and Health. Journal of Nursing and Health. 10 (5). https://periodicos.ufpel.edu.br/index.php/enfermagem/article/view/19924.
Castagna, F., et al. (2013). Effect of passive ultrasonic instrumentation as a final irrigation protocol on debris and smear layer removal-a sem analysis. Microscopy Research and Technique. 2013;76(5), 496–502.
Castelo-Baz, P., et al. (2012). In Vitro Comparison of Passive and Continuous Ultrasonic Irrigation in Simulated Lateral Canals of Extracted Teeth. Journal of Endodontics. 2012;38(5), 688–691.
Castelo-Baz, P., et al. (2016). In vitro comparison of passive and continuous ultrasonic irrigation in curved root canals. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2016;8(4), 1–5
Chubb, D. (2019). A review of the prognostic value of irrigation on root canal treatment success. Aust Endod J. 2019;45(1), 5-11.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30980478/.
Desai, P., & Himel, V. (2009). Comparative Safety of Various Intracanal Irrigation Systems. Journal of Endodontics. 2009;35(4), 545–549.
Divia, A., Nair, M., Varughese, J., & Kurien, S. (2018). A comparative evaluation of Morinda citrifolia, green tea polyphenols, and Triphala with 5% sodium hypochlorite as an endodontic irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis: An in vitro study. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2018;15(2), 117-122. Disponível em https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29576775/. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29576775/.
Duque, J., Duarte, M., Canali, L., Zancan, R., Vivan, R., Bernardes, R., et al. (2017). Comparative Effectiveness of New Mechanical Irrigant Agitating Devices for Debris Removal from the Canal and Isthmus of Mesial Roots of Mandibular Molars. J Endod. 2017; 43(2), 326-331. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27989584/.
Dutner, J., Mines, P., & Anderson, A. (2012). Irrigation trends among American Association of Endodontists members: A web-based survey. Journal of Endodontics. 2012;38(1), 37–40.
Galler, K., Widbiller, M., Buchalla, W., Eidt, A., Hiller, K., Hoffer, P., et al. (2016). EDTA conditioning of dentine promotes adhesion, migration and differentiation of dental pulp stem cells. Int Endod J. 2016; 49(6), 581–90. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26114662/.
Gil, A. C. (2017). Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. (6ed.). Editora Atlas.
Gomes, B., Berber, V., Kokaras, A., Chen, T., & Paster, B. (2015). Microbiomes of endodontic-periodontal lesions before and after chemomechanical preparation. Journal of Endodontics. 2015; 41(12), 1975-1984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.08.022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.08.022.
Hargreaves, K., Giesler, T., Henry, M., & Wang, Y. (2008). Regeneration Potential of the Young Permanent Tooth: What Does the Future Hold?. Vol. 34, Journal of Endodontics. 2008; 34(7), 51–56. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18565373/.
Hristov, K., Gateva, N., Stanimirov, P., Ishkitiev, N., Tsikandelova, R., & Mihaylova, Z. (2018). Influence of citric acid on the vitality of stem cells from apical papila. Acta Medica Bulg. 2018; 45(2), 31–5. https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/amb-2018-0016.
Jiang, L., Lak, B., Eijsvogels, L., Wesselink, P., & van, d. S. L. (2012). Comparison of the cleaning efficacy of different final irrigation techniques. J Endod. 2012;38(6), 838-841. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22595122/.
Khaord, P., Amin, A., Shah, M., Uthappa, R., Raj, N., Kachalia, T., et al. (2015). Effectiveness of different irrigation techniques on smear layer removal in apical thirds of mesial root canals of permanent mandibular first molar: A scanning electron microscopic study. J Conserv Dent. 2015;18(4), 321-326. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4502130/.
Lago, I. d., Clementino, M., & Melo, M. (n.d.). The use of ultrasound in endodontics: A literature review. RSD [Internet]. 2023Oct.19 [cited 2024Apr.9];12(10):e149121043410.
Leoni, G., et, a. (2017). Ex vivo evaluation of four final irrigation protocols on the removal of hard-tissue debris from the mesial root canal system of mandibular first molars. International Endodontic Journal. 2017;50(4), 398–406.
Lin, L., Shimizu, E., Gibbs, J., Loghin, S., Ricucci, D. (2014). Histological and histobacteriological observations of failure in revascularization / revitalization therapy: case report. J Endod. 2014; 40(2), 291–5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24461421/.
Matoso, F., Montagner, F., Jardine, A., Quintana, R., Grecca, F., Kopper, P. (2023). Effect of different disinfection protocols in bacterial viability of an intraradicular biofilm formed in situ. Brazilian Dental Journal. 2023; 34, 42-49. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202305244. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202305244.
Meschi, N., Palma, P., Cabanillas-Balsera, D. (2023). Effectiveness of revitalization in treating apical periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
International Endodontic Journal. 2023;56(S3), 510-532. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13778 https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13778
Mohammadi, Z., Asgary, S. (2015). A comparative study of antifungal activity of endodontic irrigants. Iran Endod J. 2015;10(2), 144-147. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4372792/.
Moreira, R., Pinto, E., Galo, R., Falci, S., Mesquita, A. (2019). Passive ultrasonic irrigation in root canal: systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Odontol Scand. 2019;77(1), 55-60. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30264624/.
Nakamura, V., Pinheiro, E., Prado, L., Silveira, A., Carvalho, A., Mayer, M., et, a. (2018). Effect of ultrasonic activation on the reduction of bacteria and endotoxins in root canals: a randomized clinical trial. International Endodontic Journal. 2018;51(S1), e12-e22.
https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12783 https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12783
Paragliola, R., et, a. (2010). Final Rinse Optimization: Influence of Different Agitation Protocols. Journal of Endodontics. 2010;36(2), 282–285.
Park, K., Ordinola-Zapata, R., Noblett, W., Lima, B., Staley, C. (2023). The effect of ultrasonic and multisonic irrigation on root canal microbial communities: an ex vivo study. International Endodontic Journal. 2023;1-12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13996 https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13996
Pereira A. S. et al. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. [free e-book]. Santa Maria/RS. Ed. UAB/NTE/UFSM.
Raducka, M., Piszko, A., Piszko, P. J., Jawor, N., Dobrzyński, M., Grzebieluch, W., … & Skośkiewicz−Malinowska, K. (2023). Narrative review on methods of activating irrigation liquids for root canal treatment. Applied Sciences, 13(13), 7733. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13137733.
Rother, E. T. (2007). Revisão sistemática x revisão narrativa. Acta Paul. Enferm. 20 (2). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-21002007000200001.
Roy, R., Ahmad, M., Crum, L. (1994). Physical mechanisms governing the hydrodynamic response of an oscillating ultrasonic file. International Endodontic Journal. 1994;27(4), 197-207.
Silva, E., Belladonna, F., Zuolo, A., Rodrigues, E., Ehrhardt, I., Souza, E., De-Deus, G. (2018). Effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher and XP-endo Finisher R in removing root filling remnants: a micro-CT study. Int Endod J. 2018 Jan;51(1), 86-91. doi: 10.1111/iej.12788. Epub 2017 May 29. PMID: 28467618.
Silveira, L. H. L. P. and Barboza, D. V. d. B. (2023). A importância da irrigação ultrassônica passiva para o sucesso do tratamento endodôntico: revisão narrativa de literatura. Scientia Generalis, 4(2), 358-365. https://doi.org/10.22289/sg.v4n2a30.
Siqueira, J. J., Rôças, I. (2008). Clinical implications and microbiology of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures. J Endod. 2008 Nov;34(11), 1291–1301.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.07.028 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.07.028
Stošić, N., Popović, J., Apostolovic, M., Mitić, A., Nikolić, M., Barac, R., … & Kostić, M. (2023). Effects of autoclave sterilization on cyclic fatigue resistance in 5 types of rotary endodontic instruments: an in vitro study. Medical Science Monitor, 29. https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.939694.
Susin, L., et, a. (2010). Canal and isthmus debridement efficacies of two irrigant agitation techniques in a closed system. International Endodontic Journal. 2010; 43(12), 1077–1090.
Teixeira, C., Felippe, M., Felippe, W. (2005). The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis. International Endodontic Journal. 2005; 38(5), 285–290.
Teves, A., Blanco, D., Casaretto, M., Torres, J., Alvarado, D., Coaguila-Llerena, H., et, a. (2022). Multispecies biofilm removal by XP-endo finisher and passive ultrasonic irrigation: a scanning electron microscopy study. Australian Endodontic Journal. 2022; 48(1):91-97.
https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12549 https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12549
Uzunoglu, E., Gorduysus, M., Gorduysus, O. (2015). A comparison of different irrigation systems and gravitational effect on final extrusion of the irrigant. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2015;(e218 e223).
Van, D. S. L., et, a. (2007). Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: A review of the literature. International Endodontic Journal. 2007; 40(6), 415–426.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Felipe Vargas Canton; Gustavo Lúcio do Nascimento de Souza; Pâmela Gracielle da Fonseca; Jader Camilo Pinto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
