Panorama of Researches on Satisfaction in Teaching Work in the Cognitive Social Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i8.6353Keywords:
Systematic review; Job satisfaction; Teachers; Cognitive social theoryAbstract
The job satisfaction of teachers has been associated with the affective reactions of these professionals in relation to the teaching function. This study aims to build an overview of research on teacher job satisfaction, conducting a systematic review. Articles published from 2000 to 2016 were collected in the databases of CAPES - periodicals and Scielo. The searches resulted in 36 sources for analysis. It was noted, from the results of the surveyed articles, that the studies sought to investigate the occurrence of a relationship between satisfaction in teaching work with some variables, such as: self-efficacy, collective effectiveness, emotional exhaustion, stress, among others. The relationship between these variables has been an important focus of studies on the referred construct from the Social Cognitive Theory. In addition, it was found to be important that more research on the topic of satisfaction in teaching work be carried out in order that more articles are published in the area.
References
Aldridge, J. M. & Fraser, B. J. (2016). Teachers views of their school climate and its relationship with teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction. Learning Environments Research, 19, 291-307.
Badri, M. A., Mohaidat, J., Ferrandino, V. & El Mourad, T. (2013). The social cognitive modelo f job satisfaction among teachers: testing and validation. International Journal of Education Research, 57, 12-24.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Book,
Prentice-Hall, Inc. Retrieved from http://books.google.de/books?hl=de&lr=&id=rcnJB7Wkr9YC&oi=fnd&pg=PA94&dq=the+social+foundations+of+thought+and+action&ots=DYNNnRPwhK&sig=ajTjjUIM2PPvAz2Qvjm4Wch-gEc
Bogler, R. & Nir, A. E. (2012). The importance of teachers’ perceived organizational support to job satisfaction: What's empowerment got to do with it? Journal of Educational Administration, 50(3), 287–306. doi:10.1108/09578231211223310
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., & Steca, P. (2003). Efficacy Beliefs as Determinants of Teachers’ Job Satisfaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 821–832. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.821
Collie, R. J., Shapka, J. D., & Perry, N. E. (2012). School climate and social–emotional learning: Predicting teacher stress, job satisfaction, and teaching efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology. doi:10.1037/a0029356
Dancey, C. P., & Reidy, J. (2006). Estatística sem matemática para psicologia. Porto Alegre: Artmed.
Duyar, I., Gumus, S., & Bellibas, M. S. (2013). Multilevel analysis of teacher work attitudes: The influence of principal leadership and teacher collaboration. International Journal of Educational Management, 27(7), 700–719. doi:10.1108/IJEM-09-2012-0107
Høigaard, R., Giske, R., & Sundsli, K. (2012). Newly qualified teachers’ work engagement and teacher efficacy influences on job satisfaction, burnout, and the intention to quit. European Journal of Teacher Education, 35(3), 347–357. doi:10.1080/02619768.2011.633993
Klassen, R. M., & Chiu, M. M. (2010). Effects on teachers’ self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 741–756. doi:10.1037/a0019237
Klassen, R. M., Foster, R. Y., Rajani, S., & Bowman, C. (2009). Teaching in the Yukon: Exploring teachers’ efficacy beliefs, stress, and job satisfaction in a remote setting. International Journal of Educational Research, 48(6), 381–394. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2010.04.002
Klassen, R. M., Usher, E. L., & Bong, M. (2010). Teachers’ collective efficacy, job satisfaction, and job stress in cross-cultural context. The Journal of Experimental Education, 78(4), 464–486. doi:10.1080/00220970903292975
Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In: Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 1297–1349).
Malinen, Olli-Pekka., & Savolainen, H. (2016). The effect of perceived school climate and teacher efficacy in behavior management on job satisfaction and burnout: A longitudinal study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 144-152. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.08.012
Martin, N. K., Sass, D. a., & Schmitt, T. A. (2012). Teacher efficacy in student engagement, instructional management, student stressors, and burnout: A theoretical model using in-class variables to predict teachers’ intent-to-leave. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(4), 546–559. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2011.12.003
Mau, W.-C. J., Ellsworth, R., & Hawley, D. (2008). Job satisfaction and career persistence of beginning teachers. International Journal of Educational Management, 22(1), 48–61. doi:10.1108/09513540810844558
Mehta, T. G., Atkins, M. S., & Frazier, S. L. (2013). The organizational health of urban elementary schools: School health and teacher functioning. School Mental Health, 5(3), 144–154. doi:10.1007/s12310-012-9099-4
Moè, A., Pazzaglia, F., & Ronconi, L. (2010). When being able is not enough. The combined value of positive affect and self-efficacy for job satisfaction in teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(5), 1145–1153. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.02.010
Ramos, M. F. H. (2015) Modelo Social Cognitivo de Satisfação no trabalho e Eficácia Coletiva: Percepções dobre a docência. (2015). Tese de Doutorado, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém-PA.
Ramos, M. F. H., Fernandez, A. P. O, Furtado, K. C. N., Ramos, E. M. L. S., Silva, S. S. C., & Pontes, F. A. R. (2016). Satisfação no trabalho docente: Uma análise a partir do modelo social cognitivo de satisfação no trabalho e da eficácia coletiva docente. Estudos de Psicologia (Natal). 21 (2016), n.2, 179-191. doi:10.5935/1678-4669.20160018.
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2007). Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy and relations with strain factors, perceived collective teacher efficacy, and teacher burnout. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 611–625. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.611
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2010). Teacher self-efficacy and teacher burnout: A study of relations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 1059–1069. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.11.001
Szwarcfiter, J. L. (1984). Grafos e algorítimos computacionais. Rio de Janeiro: Campus.
Veldman, I., Van Tartwijk, J., Brekelmans, M. & Wubbels, T. (2013). Job satisfaction and teacher-student relationships across the teaching career: four case studies. Teaching and teacher Education, 32, 55-65.
Viel-Ruma, K., Houchins, D., Jolivette, K. & Benson, G. (2010). Efficacy Beliefs of special educators: the relationships among collective efficacy, teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the teacher education Division of the council for exceptional children, 33(3), 225-233.
Von der Embse, N. P., Sandilos, L. E., Pendergast, L., & Mankin, A. (2016). Teacher stress, teaching-efficacy, and job satisfaction in response to test-based educational accountability policies. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 308-317. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.001
Wang, H., Hall, N. C., & Rahimi, S. (2015). Self-efficacy and causal attributions in teachers: Effects on burnout, job satisfaction, illness, and quitting intentions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 120-130. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2014.12.005
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Maely Ferreira Holanda Ramos, Fernando Augusto Ramos Pontes, Simone Souza da Costa Silva, Erika Cristina de Carvalho Silva Pereira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
