Projects in dispute: contradictory public policies in the scope of Professional Education in Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v8i5.927Keywords:
professional education; public policy; education projectsAbstract
This article aims to make a brief historical rescue of some public policies of professional education in Brazil, revealing their contradictions. It starts from the educational policies of the 1990s that established the mandatory separation between high school and vocational education, intensifying the instrumental character in the field of professional education. In this educational perspective, we can see a process of exclusionary inclusion, since its disqualification, which includes in the labor market but excludes the possibilities that the subject has to acquire an onilateral and polytechnic education. In the accomplishment of this research, the bibliographical research was used, gathering, analyzing in an exploratory perspective, seeking to gather information about the themes of the projects that appeared in the history of Brazil about the Professional Education. In this way, a precarization of the work is legitimized from this continuity of precarious proposals of Professional Education. This precariousness that plagues this modality, provides a fragmentary, simplistic and technicist formation, providing a unilateral education to the detriment of onilateral formation. While omnilateral formation enables a formation that encompasses all dimensions of the individual broadly, in all his physical and intellectual capacities, unilateral formation fragments the individual so that he is only a subject specialized in manual work and favor the profit destined to the capitalist mode of production.
References
Bulhões, M. Plano Nacional de Qualificação do Trabalhador - Planfor: acertos, limites e desafios vistos do extremo sul. São Paulo Perspec. São Paulo , v. 18, n. 4, p. 39-49, Dec. 2004 .
Kuenzer, A. A educação profissional nos anos 2000: a dimensão subordinada das políticas de inclusão. Educ. Soc., Campinas , v. 27, n. 96, p. 877-910, Oct. 2006. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-73302006000300012. Acesso em: 04 de janeiro de 2019.
Kuenzer, A. O ensino médio no Plano Nacional de Educação 2011-2020: superando a década perdida?. Educ. Soc., Campinas , v. 31, n. 112, p. 851-873, Sept. 2010. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-73302010000300011. Acesso em: 02 de janeiro de 2019.
Machado, M. Quando a obrigatoriedade afirma e nega o direito à educação. Revista
Retratos da Escola, Brasília: ESFORCE, v. 4, n. 7, p. 245-258, jul./dez. 2010. Disponível
em: . Acesso em: 29 dezembro de 2018
Marconi, M. ; Lakatos, E. Metodologia do trabalho científico: procedimentos básicos, pesquisa bibliográfica, publicações e trabalhos científicos. -6. reimpr. São Paulo: Atlas, 2011.
Minayo, M. C. S. (Org.). Pesquisa social: teoria, método e criatividade. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2001.
Monteiro, A.; Jucá, S; Silva S. O livro didático e a sua influência na formação dos discentes da educação básica de escolas públicas. Research, Society And Development, v. 8, n. 1, 18 dez. 2018. Disponível em: https://rsd.unifei.edu.br/index.php/rsd/article/view/643 Acesso em: 06 de janeiro de 2019.
Moura, D. H; Lima F., Domingos, L. Silva, M. Politecnia e formação integrada: confrontos conceituais, projetos políticos e contradições históricas da educação brasileira. Rev. Bras. Educ.,Rio de Janeiro, v. 20, n. 63, p. 1057-1080, Dec. 2015. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-24782015206313. Acesso em 08 de janeiro de 2019
Nosella, P. Ensino médio. Em busca do princípio pedagógico. Educação & Sociedade, Campinas: CEDES, v. 32, n. 117, p. 1.051-1.066, out./
Severino, A. Metodologia do Trabalho Científico. 24. Ed.São Paulo: Cortez, 2016.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.