Biocarbón producido a partir de desechos de cama em avicultura
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i11.19704Palabras clave:
Biomasa; Residuos; Briquetas; Biochar; Cama en avicultura.Resumen
Brasil genera una cantidad sustancial de desechos de cama de aves debido a su prominencia mundial en la producción de pollos de engorde. El volumen de la biomasa de la cama em avicultura genera un impacto ambiental considerable. El objetivo fue caracterizar el biocarbón producido a partir de residuos de cama em avicultura en diferentes condiciones con el fin de determinar el mejor tiempo de residencia y temperatura. La basura de las aves se recogió después de dos lotes de cría de pollos. Se realizaron cinco tratamientos para la producción de biocarbón a una temperatura de 450 ° C (definida por análisis termogravimétrico - TGA) y tiempos de residencia de 0.5, 1, 2, 4 y 6h. El biocarbón producido se evaluó mediante análisis imediata, contenido de humedad, rendimiento gravimétrico, microscopía electrónica de barrido (SEM), espectroscopía de energía dispersiva (EDS) y HHV (valor calorífico superior). Los resultados revelaron que las mejores condiciones para la producción de biocarbón fueron 450 ° C (pirólisis) y un tiempo de residencia de 0,5 h, con un rendimiento gravimétrico del 37,21%. Concluimos que el biocarbón producido en este estudio se recomienda para aplicación al suelo, pero no era adecuado para fines energéticos debido a su alto contenido de cenizas (hasta 33,66%) y bajo HHV (18,907 J g-1).
Citas
ASTM D1102-84, Standard Test Method for Ash in Wood (2021). ASTM International, http://www.astm.org/Standards/D1102.
Barzan, R. R., Jordão, L. T., Firmano, R. F., Secato, T. R., Lima, F., Barzan, L. R., de Oliveira Jr., A., Castro, C., Crusciol, C. A. C., & Zucareli, C. (2021). Soil chemical attributes and nutritional status of soybean and maize intercropped with Urochloa under nitrogen rates. Agronomy Journal, 11, https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20744.
Benevides, W. S., Díaz, M. P., Guano, L. E., Pinheiro, A. R. A., Frota, L. O., Campos, W. O., & Pinto, P. W. C. (2016). Study of animal welfare through analysis and comparison of the presence of foot pad dermatitis in broilers raised in controlled environments in Brazil and Spain. Revista Brasileira de Higiene e Sanidade Animal, 10, 330-350, https://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1981-2965.20160028.
Brewer, C. E., Chuang, V. J., Masiello, C. A., Gonnermann, H., Gao, X., Dugan, B., Driver, L. E., Panzacchi, P., Zygourakis, K., & Davies, C. A. (2014). New approaches to measuring biochar density and porosity. Biomass and Bioenergy, 66, 176-185, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.03.059.
Bridgwater, A. V., Czernik, S., & Piskorz, J. (2001). Chapter 80 - An overview of fast pyrolysis. In - Progress in thermochemical biomass conversion. Blackwell Science Ltd., 977-997, https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470694954.ch80.
Chan, K. Y., van Zwieten, L., Meszaros, I., Downie, A., & Joseph, S. (2008). Using poultry litter biochars as soil amendments. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 46, 437-444, https://doi.org/10.1071/SR08036.
Chen, Y., Xu, Q., Sun, K., Han, L., Sun, H., Yang, Y., & Wang, Z. (2021). Effects of simulated diagenesis and mineral amendment on the structure, stability and imidacloprid sorption properties of biochars produced at varied temperatures. Chemosphere, 282, 121-003, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131003.
da Róz, A. L., Ricardo, J. F. C., Nakashima, G. T., & Santos, L. R. O., Yamaji, F. M. (2015). Maximization of fixed carbon content in biochar applied to carbon sequestration. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agríc. Ambient., 19, 810-814, https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v19n8p810-814.
da Silva, C. J. & do Vale, A. T. (2018). Energy density model for forest species from cerrado. Rev. Caatinga, 31, 396-404. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252018v31n216rc.
Dai, Z., Zhang, X., Tang, C., Muhammad, N., Wu, J., Brookes, P. C., & Xu, J. (2017). Potential role of biochars in decreasing soil acidification - a critical review. Science of The Total Environment, 581-582, 601-611, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.169.
de Carvalho, N. R., de Barros, J. L., da Silva, D. A., Nakashima, G. T., & Yamaji, F. M. (2020). Physical an chemical characterization of biomass used as solid fuel in a boiler. Química Nova, 10, 35-40, https://dx.doi.org/10.21577/0100-4042.20170663.
de Jong, I. C., Hindle, V. A., Butterworth, A., Engel, B., Ferrari, P., Gunnink, H., Perez Moya, T., Tuyttens, F. A. M., & van Reenen, C. G. (2016). Simplifying the Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for broiler chicken welfare. Animal, 10, 117-127, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115001706.
Demirbas, A. (2006). Effect of temperature on pyrolysis products from four nut shells. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 76, 285-289, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2005.12.012.
Domingues, R. R., Trugilho, P. F., Silva, C. A., de Melo, I. C. N. A., Melo, L. C. A., Magriotis, Z. M., & Sánches-Monedero, M. A. (2017). Properties of biochar derived from wood and high-nutrient biomasses with the aim of agronomic and environmental benefits. Journal Plos One, 12, 176-884, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176884.
Dornelas, K. C., Mascarenhas, H. N. M., Rodrigues, H. C. S., Nascimento, R. T., Brito, A. N. S., Furtado, D. A., & Nascimento, J. W. B. (2020). Withdrawn: Chicken bed: a review on reuse, treatment and influence on ambience. Poultry Science., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.09.067.
Faridullah, F., Yamamoto, S., Irshad, M., Uchiyama, T., & Toshimasa, H. (2008). Phosphorus fractionation in chicken and duck litter burned at different temperatures. Soil Science., 173, 287-295, http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SS.0b013e31816d1e5b.
Garcês, A. P. T. J., Afonso, S. M. S., Chilundo, A., & Jairoce, C.T. S. (2017). Evaluation of different litter materials for broiler production in a hot and humid environment: 2. Productive performance and carcass characteristics. Tropical Animal Health Production, 49, 369-374, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-016-1202-7.
Grimes, J. L., Smith, J., & Williams, C. M. (2019). Some alternative litter materials used for growing broilers and turkeys. World's Poultry Science Journal, 58 515-526, https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS20020037.
Guo, W., Nazim, H., Liang, Z., & Yang, D. (2016). Magnesium deficiency in plants: an urgent problem, The Crop Journal, 4, 83-91, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2015.11.003.
IBGE – Brazilian Institute of Geografy and Statistics, Livestock production statistics: Initial results (2021). IBGE, https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/periodicos/3087/epp_pr_2021_1tri.pdf.
Junna, S., He, F., Pan, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2016). Effects of pyrolysis temperature and residence time on physicochemical properties of different biochar types. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B - Soil & Plant Science, 67, 12-22, https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2016.1214745.
Katsuhara, M., Rhee, J. Y., Sugimoto, G., & Chung, G. C. (2011). Early response in water relations influenced by NaCl reflects tolerance or sensitivity of barley plants to salinity stress via aquaporins. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 57, 50-60, https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2010.541870.
Kelleher, B. P., Leahy, J. J., Henihan, A. M., O'Dwyer, T. F., Sutton, D., & Leahy, M. J. (2002). Advances in poultry litter disposal technology – a review, Bioresource Technology, 83, 27-36, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-8524(01)00133-x.
Kyakuwaire, M., Olupot, G., Amoding, A., Nkedi-Kizza, P., & Basamba, T. A. (2019). How safe is chicken litter for land application as an organic fertilizer?: A review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16, 3521, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193521.
Lehmann, J., Rillig, M. C., Thies, J., Masiello, C. A., Hockaday, W. C., & Crowley, D. (2011). Biochar effects on soil biota – a review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 43, 1812-1836, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.022.
Li, S., Wu, A., Deng, S., & Pan, W. (2008). Effect of co-combustion of chicken litter and coal on emissions in a laboratory-scale fluidized bed combustor. Fuel, Processing Technology., 89, 7-12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2007.06.003.
Lin, Y., Munroe, P., Joseph, S., Ziolkowski, A., van Zwieten, L., Kimber, S., & Rust, J. (2013). Chemical and structural analysis of enhanced biochars: Thermally treated mixtures of biochar, chicken litter, clay and minerals. Chemosphere, 91, 35-40, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.11.063.
Liu, T., Wu, F., Wang, W., Chen, J., Li, Z., Dong, X., Patton, J., Pei, Z., & Zheng, H. (2011). Effeccts of calcium on seed germination, seedling growth and photosynthesis of six forest tree species under simulated acid rain. Tree Physiology, 31, 402-413, https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpr019.
Macklin, K. S., Hess, J. B., & Bilgili, S. F. (2008). In-house windrow composting and its effects on foodborne pathogens. Journal of Applied Poultry Ressearch, 17, 121-127, https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2007-00051.
Masud, M. M., Baquy, M. A., Akhter, S., Sen, R., Barman, A., & Khatun, M. R. (2020). Liming effects of poultry litter derived biochar on soil acidity amelioration and maize growth. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 202, 110-865, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110865.
Padilla, E. R. D., Santos, L. R. O., da Silva, D. A., Barros, J. L., Belini, G. B., Yamaji, F. M., Souza, T. M., & Campos, C. I. (2019). Eucalyptus bark charcoal: The influence of carbonization temperature in thermal behavior. Materials Research., 22, 1-5, https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5373-MR-2019-0371.
Parente, T. L., Lazarini, E., Caioni, S., de Souza, L. G. M., Pivetta, R. S., & Bossolani, J. W. (2016). Potassium as topdressing in maize and the residual effects on soybean grown in succession, Rev. Agroambiente On-line, 10, 193-200, http://dx.doi.org/10.18227/1982-8470ragro.v10i3.3258.
Pariyar, P., Kumari, K., Jain, M. K., & Jadhao, P. S. (2020). Evaluation of change in biochar properties derived from different feedstocks and pyrolysis temperature for environmental and agricultural application. Science of The Total Environment, 713, 136-433, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136433.
Pereira, M. E., Varanda, L. D., Nakashima, G. T., Hansted, A. L. S., da Silva, D. A., Tomeleri, J. O. P., Belini, G. B., & Yamaji, F. M. (2019). Characterization of the poultry litter biomass for production of biochar. Rev. Virtual Quím., 11, 1330-1343, https://doi.org/10.21577/1984-6835.20190092.
Pereira, A. S., Shitsuka, D. M., Parreira, F. J., & Shitsuka, R. (2018). Metodologia da Pesquisa Científica. [free e-book]. Santa Maria: UAB/NTE/UFSM. https://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/handle/1/15824/Lic_Computacao_Metodologia-Pesquisa-Cientifica.pdf?sequence=1
Rogeri, D. A., Ernani, P. R., Mantovani, A., & Lourenço, K. S. (2016). Composition of poultry litter in southern Brazil, Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo., 40, 140-697, https://doi.org/10.1590/18069657rbcs20140697.
Shepherd, E. M., airchild, B. D., & Ritz, FC. W. (2017). Alternative bedding materials and litter depth impact litter moisture and footpad dermatitis. Journal of Applied Poultry Research., 26, 518-528, https://doi.org/10.3382/japr/pfx024.
Siefert, R. L., Scudlark, J. R., Potter, A. G., Simonsen, K. A., & Savidge, K. B. (2004). Characterization of atmospheric ammonia emissions from a commercial chicken house on the Delmarva Peninsula. Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 2769-2778, https://doi.org/10.1021/es0345874.
Song, W. & Guo, M. (2012) Quality variations of poultry litter biochar generated at different pyrolysis temperatures. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 94, 138-145, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2011.11.018.
Speratti, A. B., M. S. Johnson, H. M. Sousa, G. M., & Torres, E. G. Couto, (2017). Impact of different agricultural waste biochars on maize biomass and soil water content in a brazilian cerrado arenosol, Agronomy. 7 49, https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy7030049.
Sweeten, J. M., Annamalai, K., Thien, B., & McDonald, L. A. (2003). Co-firing of coal and cattle feedlot biomass (FB) fuels. Part I. Feedlot biomass (cattle manure) fuel quality and characteristics. Fuel, 82, 1167-1182, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(03)00007-3.
Tańczuk, M., Junga, R., Werle, S., Chabiński, M., & Ziółkowskic, Ł. (2019). Experimental analysis of the fixed bed gasification process of the mixtures of the chicken manure with biomass. Renewable Energy, 136, 1055-1063, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.05.074.
Tripathi, N., Hills, C. D., Singh, R. S., & Atkinson, C. J. (2019). Biomass waste utilization in low-carbon products: harnessing a major potential resource. Climated and Atmosperic Science, 2, 35, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-019-0093-5.
Usmani, Z., Sharma, M., Awasthi, A. K., Sivakumar, N., Lukk, T., Pecoraro, L., Thakur, V. K., Roberts, D., Newbold, J., & Gupta, V. K. (2021). Bioprocessing of waste biomass for sustainable product development and minimizing environmental impact. Bioresource Technology, 322, 124-548, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124548.
Vieites, F. M., Araújo, G. M., do Vale, P. A. C. B., Souza, C. S., Névoa, M. L., de Vargas Junior, J. G., Nunes, R. V., & Arruda, N. V. M., (2015). Minerals balance and performance of broilers at 21 days of age diet containing Solanum malacoxylon. Rev. Bras. Saúde Prod. Anim., 16, 535-543, https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-99402015000300006.
Voss-Rech, D., Trevisol, I. M., Brentano, L., Silva, V. S., Rebelatto, R., Jaenisch, F. R. F., Okino, C. H., Mores, M. A. Z., Coldebella, A., Botton, S. A., & Vaz, C. S. L. (2017). Impact of treatments for recycled broiler litter on the viability and infectivity of microorganisms. Veterinary Microbiology., 203, 308-314, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.03.020.
Wang, S., Dai, G., Yang, H., & Luo, Z. (2017). Lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis mechanism: a state-of-art review. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 62, 33-86, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2017.05.004.
Waqas, M., Abduriazaiza, A. S., Miandad, R., Rehan, M., Barakat, M., & Nizami, A. (2018). Development of biochar as fuel and catalyst in energy recovery technologies, Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 477-488, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.017.
Yaashikaa, P. R., Kumar, P. S., Varjani, S., & Saravanan, A. (2020). A critical review on the biochar production techniques, characterization, stability and applications for circular bioeconomy, Biotechnology Reports., 28, e00570, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00570.
Yu, X. & Lu, S. (2020). Double effects of biochar in affecting the macropore system of paddy soils identified by high-resolution X-ray tomography. Science of the Total Environment, 720, 137-690, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137690.
Zdravkov, B., Cermák, J., Sefara, M., & Janku, J. (2017). Pore classification in the characterization of porus materials: a perspective. Open Chemistry, 5, 385-395, https://doi.org/10.2478/s11532-007-0017-9.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2021 Moisés Edevaldo Pereira; Luciano Donizeti Varanda; Natália Rodrigues de Carvalho; Carlos Roberto Sette Jr; Franciane Andrade de Padua; Andrea Cressoni De Conti; Fabio Minoru Yamaji
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Los autores que publican en esta revista concuerdan con los siguientes términos:
1) Los autores mantienen los derechos de autor y conceden a la revista el derecho de primera publicación, con el trabajo simultáneamente licenciado bajo la Licencia Creative Commons Attribution que permite el compartir el trabajo con reconocimiento de la autoría y publicación inicial en esta revista.
2) Los autores tienen autorización para asumir contratos adicionales por separado, para distribución no exclusiva de la versión del trabajo publicada en esta revista (por ejemplo, publicar en repositorio institucional o como capítulo de libro), con reconocimiento de autoría y publicación inicial en esta revista.
3) Los autores tienen permiso y son estimulados a publicar y distribuir su trabajo en línea (por ejemplo, en repositorios institucionales o en su página personal) a cualquier punto antes o durante el proceso editorial, ya que esto puede generar cambios productivos, así como aumentar el impacto y la cita del trabajo publicado.
